Sugar taxation for climate and sustainability goals

  • Bai, H. M., Zaid, A., Catrin, S., Ahmed, K. & Ahmed, A. J. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. Int. J. Surg. 8, 8–17 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, G. COVID-19: public health must be “at the core” of global recovery plans, say doctors. Brit. Med. J. 369, m2077 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. Health equity, social policy, and promoting recovery from COVID-19. J. Health Polit. Policy Law 45, 983–995 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Belesova, K., Heymann, D. L. & Haines, A. Integrating climate action for health into COVID-19 recovery plans. Brit. Med. J. 370, m3169 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J. A. Nature and COVID-19: the pandemic, the environment, and the way ahead. Ambio 50, 767–781 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council Conclusions, 17–21 July 2020 (European Council, 2020); https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/07/21/european-council-conclusions-17-21-july-2020/

  • Van de Graaf, R. C. & Hofstra, L. Obesity and COVID-19: the role of the food industry. Brit. Med. J. 370, m2813 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Romero, L. M. et al. Association between tax on sugar sweetened beverages and soft drink consumption in adults in Mexico: open cohort longitudinal analysis of Health Workers Cohort Study. Brit. Med. J. 369, m1311 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pell, D. et al. Changes in soft drinks purchased by British households associated with the UK soft drinks industry levy: controlled interrupted time series analysis. Brit. Med. J. 372, n254 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, K. D. et al. The public Health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 1250–1250 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Andrade, M. A., Watson, J. E. & Maxwell, S. L. Unveiling the environmental benefits of reducing sugar. Lancet Planet. Health 4, E497–E498 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Searchinger, T. et al. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319, 1238–1240 (2008).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzaho, A. M. N., Kamara, J. K. & Toole, M. Biofuel production and its impact on food security in low and middle income countries: implications for the post-2015 sustainable development goals. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 78, 503–516 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., Nakicenovic, N., Visbeck, M. & Stevance, A.-S. Policy: five priorities for the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Nature 520, 432–433 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F. & Steinberger, J. K. A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nat. Sustainability 1, 88–95 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L. C. & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. Implications of net energy-return-on-investment for a low-carbon energy transition. Nat. Energy 3, 334–340 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, L., Morales, L., Lühiste, M. & Bischof, D. The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: a two-step comparative examination. Environ. Politics. 27, 42–68 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, P. & Honnery, D. What is the global potential for renewable energy? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 244–252 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, B. D. Biofuels and sustainability. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1185, 119–134 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazari, M. T. et al. Biofuels and their connections with the sustainable development goals: a bibliometric and systematic review. Environ. Dev. Sustain 23, 11139–11156 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • de Castro, C., Carpintero, Ó., Frechoso, F., Mediavilla, M. & de Miguel, L. J. A top-down approach to assess physical and ecological limits of biofuels. Energy 64, 506–512 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockway, P. E., Owen, A., Brand-Correa, L. I. & Hardt, L. Estimation of global final-stage energy-return-on-investment for fossil fuels with comparison to renewable energy sources. Nat. Energy 4, 612–621 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, P., Mastrorilli, M., Ventrella, D., Vonella, A. V. & Campi, P. Modelling the suitability of energy crops through a fuzzy-based system approach: the case of sugar beet in the bioethanol supply chain. Energy 196, 117160 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C., Balogh, S. & Murphy, D. What is the minimum EROI that a sustainable society must have? Energies 2, 25–47 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlason, R. S. et al. Energy return on investment of Austrian sugar beet: a small-scale comparison between organic and conventional production. Biomass Bioenergy 75, 267–271 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855–1259855 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, L. P. & Ghazoul, J. Biofuels, biodiversity, and people: understanding the conflicts and finding opportunities. Biol. Conserv. 141, 2450–2460 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S. & Hawthorne, P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319, 1235–1238 (2008).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • de Andrade Junior, M. A. U., Valin, H., Soterroni, A. C., Ramos, F. M. & Halog, A. Exploring future scenarios of ethanol demand in Brazil and their land-use implications. Energy Pol. 134, 110958 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade Junior, M. A., Maxwell, S. L. & Watson, J. E. Renewed threats to Brazilian biodiversity from sugarcane. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18, 178–180 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, T. H. T., Mok, A., Ahmad, R., Rangan, A. & Louie, J. C. Y. Intake of free sugar and micronutrient dilution in Australian children and adolescents. Eur. J. Nutr. 58, 2485–2495 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidhuber, J. et al. The Global Nutrient Database: availability of macronutrients and micronutrients in 195 countries from 1980 to 2013. Lancet Planet. Health 2, e353–e368 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburn, B. A. et al. The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: The Lancet Commission report. Lancet 393, 791–846 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • World Food and Agriculture—Statistical Yearbook 2020 (FAO, 2020).

  • FAOSTAT (FAO, 2020); https://fao.org/faostat/

  • Delgado, A. V. & de Armas Casanova, C. Sugar Processing and By-products of the Sugar Industry (FAO, 2001).

  • Sugar: World Markets and Trade (USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2021); https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/sugar-world-markets-and-trade

  • Brazil: Sugar Annual (USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2021); https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/brazil-sugar-annual-7

  • OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2020–2029 (OECD Publishing, 2020); https://doi.org/10.1787/1112c23b-en

  • European Union: Sugar Annual (USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2021); https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/european-union-sugar-annual-1

  • EU Agricultural Outlook for Markets and Income 2018–2030 (European Commission, 2018); https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/food-farming-fisheries/farming/documents/medium-term-outlook-2018-report_en.pdf

  • EU Sugar Balance 25 February 2021 Update (European Commission, 2012); https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/food-farming-fisheries/farming/documents/sugar-balance-sheet-presentation_en.pdf

  • Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children (World Health Organization, 2015); https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549028

  • Cunningham, S. C. et al. Balancing the environmental benefits of reforestation in agricultural regions. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 17, 301–317 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Manochio, C., Andrade, B. R., Rodriguez, R. P. & Moraes, B. S. Ethanol from biomass: a comparative overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 80, 743–755 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Approximated Estimates for Greenhouse Gas Emissions (European Environment Agency, 2020); https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/approximated-estimates-for-greenhouse-gas-emissions-2

  • Bordonal, R. et al. Sustainability of sugarcane production in Brazil. A review. Agron. Sustainable Dev. 38, 13 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, B. M. & Ng, S. W. Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: Lessons to date and the future of taxation. PLoS Med. 18, e1003412 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandy, L. K., Scarborough, P., Harrington, R. A., Rayner, M. & Jebb, S. A. Reductions in sugar sales from soft drinks in the UK from 2015 to 2018. BMC Med. 18, 20 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng, A. M. et al. Impact of sugar‐sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and dietary intake: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obes. Rev. 20, 1187–1204 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreyeva, T., Long, M. W. & Brownell, K. D. The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. Am. J. Public Health 100, 216–222 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfinder, M. et al. Taxation of unprocessed sugar or sugar-added foods for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012333.pub2 (2016).

  • Taillie, L. S. et al. Changes in food purchases after the Chilean policies on food labelling, marketing, and sales in schools: a before and after study. Lancet Planet. Health 5, e526–e533 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2017 (WHO, 2017).

  • Pell, D. et al. Support for, and perceived effectiveness of, the UK soft drinks industry levy among UK adults: cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study. BMJ Open 9, e026698 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Drews, S. & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Clim. Policy 16, 855–876 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Outlaw, J. L. et al. Economics of sugar-based ethanol production and related policy issues. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 39, 357–363 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, C. & van den Bergh, J. C. M. Human health impacts of climate change as a catalyst for public engagement. Int. J. Clim. Change Strateg. Manag. 8, 578–596 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • World Population Prospects 2019 (Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, 2019); https://population.un.org/wpp/

  • Hoffman, S. J. et al. Cigarette consumption estimates for 71 countries from 1970 to 2015: systematic collection of comparable data to facilitate quasi-experimental evaluations of national and global tobacco control interventions. BMJ 365, l2231 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenk, I., Landquist, B. & de Imana, O. R. The product carbon footprint of EU beet sugar (part I). Sugar Ind. 137, 169–177 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC IPCC Special Report Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  • Review of EU Biofuels Directive (Energy and Transport Directorate-General, European Commission, 2006).

  • Quality and Greenhouse Gas Intensities of Transport Fuels in the EU in 2017 (European Environmental Agency, 2019); https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/quality-and-greenhouse-gas-intensities-1

  • de Figueiredo, E. B., Panosso, A. R., Romão, R. & La Scala, N.Jr. Greenhouse gas emission associated with sugar production in southern Brazil. Carbon Balance Manag. 5, 3 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, P. W. The carbon footprint of sugar. Sugar Ind. 135, 427–434 (2010).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IGES, 2006).

  • About the Author: AKDSEO

    You May Also Like